Central Fisheries Board


Skip navigation



Advanced search

Contact : FAQ : Accessibility |

| Home » Fisheries Research and Development » Fish Tagging »

Coarse Fish Tagging Programme 2002 Results

Fish Tagged in Previous Years

A number of tagged fish that were stocked in previous years have been captured by anglers in 2002. Pike angling events held on the Grand Canal at Rahan in February 2002 were very successful. This area is currently being managed as a pike fishery and between 2000 and 2001, was stocked with 200 floy-tagged pike. In January 2002 anglers from the Dublin Pike Anglers Club fished this section. During their competition 26 anglers captured 70 pike to 17lbs.  Nine of these fish were floy-tagged.  The tagged fish were reported in good condition and exhibited a mean weight gain (since stocking) in excess of 14% (Table 1). 

Photo: The location of a floy tag in front of the dorsal fin on a tagged pike

Tullamore and District Angling Club held a competition on the same stretch of canal in February 2002. Forty-one anglers caught 67 pike to 15lbs.  One tagged pike was captured on this occasion and was reported to be in excellent condition.  Interestingly, this fish (Tag No. CFB 06283) was one of those captured by the Dublin Pike Anglers just two weeks previously.  This suggests that relocated fish can provide repeated angling sport on Inland Waterways.

Talble 1. Change in length and weight of pike in the Grand Canal at Rahan between time of stocking and their subsequent recapture.
Tag No. Stocked Length at stocking (cm) Weight at stocking (kg) Date Recaptured Method of recapture Length at recapture (cm) Weight at recapture (kg) Change in weight (kg) %
1451 04/04/01 56.7 1.6 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 66 2 0.4 + 25
1455 04/04/01 54 1.33 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 57.2 1.38 0.05 + 4
1462 04/04/01 46.5 1 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 51 0.84 -0.16 - 16
1466 04/04/01 50.7 1.04 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 59 1.7 0.66 + 63
1478 04/05/01 53.5 1.35 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 63.5 1.72 0.37 +27
1550 / / / 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers / / / /
06552 04/04/01 58 1.61 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 71 2.1 0.49 +30
06283 11/04/01 63 2.4 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 70 2.1 -0.3 - 12.5
06333 04/04/01 67 7.88 27/1/02 Dublin Pike Anglers 99 7.65 -0.23 -3
06283 04/11/00 63 2.4 17/2/02 Tullamore AC / 2.2 -0.2 -8

Fish Tagged In 2002

To date, of the fish tagged and released into inland waterways in 2002, a total of 18 individual fish have been recaptured.  Anglers and members of the public have reported seventeen of these fish and one fish was recorded during an electrofishing survey conducted by the CFB (Table 5).  One fish was captured three times and another twice, giving a total of 21 verified tag returns.   To date, there have also been a number of confirmed recaptures of fish tagged in 2002 which are not included in the analysis.  Commonly this involves the reported capture of a tagged fish but a failure by the angler to record the tag number.  Large  (>7lb) Sheelin origin bream, for example, which were stocked at the Blundell Aqueduct (2000), near Edenderry regularly appear in angler catches (Pauric Kelly pers.comm).

Table 2. Recaptures of tagged coarse fish released into Inland Waterways during 2002.
Species No’s Tagged % of Total Fish Tagged No’s Recaptured % of Total Recaptures % of Species Recaptured
Bream 90 19.03 1 5.55 1.11
Perch 13 2.75 0 0 0
Pike 71 15.01 2 * 11.11 2.81
Roach x Bream 186 39.32 3 * 16.66 1.6
Roach 64 13.53 0 0 0
Rudd x Bream 1 0.21 0 0 0
Rudd 6 1.27 0 0 0
Tench 41 8.67 12 66.66 29.27
Total 473 100 18 100  
*  * 1 fish found dead

An overall recapture rate of 4.4% was recorded. This represents a relatively good return over a short time period when compared with a similar programme conducted on the canals during the early 1990s, when a return rate of 4.2% was recorded over a period of several years (Conneely et al, 1993).

There are major differences in the recapture rates recorded between the different species, ranging from 0% for roach and perch to 29% for tench.  Indeed, tench represent marginally less than 9% of the total number of fish tagged and yet accounted for 66% of all tag recaptures, a disproportionately large number of all tag returns to date.  The reasons for this are unclear, but may relate to one or more of the following:

While it is premature to draw any firm conclusions at this stage, there is considerable anecdotal evidence to suggest that stocked and relocated coarse fish enhance the long-term angling in a variety of recipient waters. This is evidenced by the capture of numerous tagged pike at Rahan (see Interim Report 1, 2002) and the large Sheelin bream which continue to be captured in the Edenderry and Leixlip sections of the Grand and Royal Canals.

One noteworthy event was the capture of a 7lb 11oz Sheelin bream from the harbour at Kilcock.  This fish was caught in July 2002, having been stocked over a year previously.  Indeed, it has been observed in other systems that relocated L. Sheelin bream can “disappear” for a number of years before featuring in angler catches (Michael Fitzpatrick, Northern Regional Fisheries Board, pers. comm.).  The results to date are greatly encouraging but more confirmed tag returns are crucial in monitoring the success of our current stocking programmes and in informing our future management plans for the inland waterways.

Angler awareness and co-operation is vital to the success of this project.  Extensive publicity and a move towards tagging fish stocked into the more enclosed canal systems has both increased the prospects of anglers capturing tagged fish and also their subsequent reporting of it.  Continued tagging of relocated pike and coarse fish will be necessary to increase our sample size and the likelihood of returns.

Table 3.  Movements of tagged coarse fish released into inland waterways derived from tag recaptures during the period ending August 31st.
Species Tag No Release site Recapture Site Distance/Direction from Release Site Days at Liberty Recapture Method
Bream 11090 Edenderry Aqueduct Toberdaly Bridge 12.3km West 71 Angling
Ro x Br 10016 Edenderry Aqueduct Aqueduct 0km 19 Angling
Tench 10421 Edenderry Aqueduct 1.6km W. Rhode 12.9Km West 39 Angling
Tench 10228 Edenderry Aqueduct 2.4km E. Rhode 7.1km West 39 Angling
Tench 10011 Edenderry Aqueduct Colgans Br. 2.2km West 58 Angling
Pike 05930 Armstrong Bridge 200m From Armstrong Br. 0.2km 3 Angling
Tench 11770 Armstrong Bridge 1.6km E from Armstrong Br. 1600m East 56 Angling
Ro/Br Hybrid 10127 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 300m E of Boat Slip 0.3km East 75 Angling
Tench 10038 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 300m E of Boat Slip 0.3km East 31 Angling
Tench 10115 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 300m E of Boat Slip 0.3km East 25 Angling
Tench 10116 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 300m E of Amenity Area 0.3km East 97 Angling
Tench 10067 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 200m E of Amenity Area 0.2km East 96 Electrofishing
Tench 10038 Leixlip Boat Slip 50m E of 13th Lock 4.5km West 98 (67) Electrofishing
Ro/Br Hybrid 10127 Leixlip Boat Slip ~ 200 m E of Collins Br. 1.2Km East 89 (14) Electrofishing
Ro/Br Hybrid 10127 Leixlip Boat Slip ~500m E Pakenham Br. 3.3km East 93 (4) Electrofishing
Ro/Br Hybrid 10070 Leixlip Boat Slip Castleknock Station 7.6km East 20 Dead
Pike 10135 Chambers Lock Chambers Lock 0m 19 Dead

Next: Tagged Roach x Bream Hybrid Recaptured After Two years at Liberty
Previous: The wanderings of Irish tope

[Return to the top of the page]

| Valid XHTML 1.1! | Valid CSS! | Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0